The Coo Reference Guide Part 2

Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
2,084
Reaction score
118
Location
Germany
Hi there,

Im no introducing the start of the new coo guide to the RS community. I hope you enjoy it and have a little patience. Im far away from getting all pics online soon! But I will do my best to get this on as fast as possible!


Before you check out the coo guide it‘s important to read the introduction. This will give you a little inside information on the following themes:

--> Production Process
--> COO: Declaration and forms
--> General terms in COO collecting


This is going to be mainly a brief introduction because of two reasons. The first reason is I that I am not a native English speaking person. The second is, if the articles are too long I am worried that less people will read. Ill try to keep it as short as possible but will give of course a deeper look inside the COO theme, because this is what this thread is mainly about. If you have further questions feel free to post them or contact me




THE PRODUCTION PROCESS:

For the production process I advise people read the following article:
http://www.12back.com/features/creation/creation.php3
In addition, theswca.com also has good information, check out the following article:
http://theswca.com/lexicon/steelmold.html

No matter where or how you get your information its really important for this guide to know at which time in the production process the country stamps where made.

To summarize the production process we can say:
First is the „original sculpt“ that is made of a metal skeleton with , clay for the rough sculpture and wax for finishing the sculpt. Then comes the „hard copy“ which is a copy of the original sculpt in a very hard material which is necessary for making the steel molds. The so called „steel molds“ can be made from aluminium, steel or even brass. The „hardcopy“ is transfered into the mold with kind of a three-dimensional pantograph. This is of course just a short summary and there is many different ways, depending on the sculpturer and many other aspects.

The following is now important for understanding when a coo is placed. The first figures produced in that mold is the so called „first shot“. These normally dont have any markings! The awarding authority (Kenner) has a look at this „first shot“ and gives its okay for the production. At this point the molds first gets duplicated and then stamped and marked! I have no proof of the following but to me it makes totally sense: The steel-molds were the original ones, the ones the first shots were made from. These were duplicated in steel, aluminium or brass. Aluminium and brass are more easy to work with because they are much „softer“ then steel. Especially for the limbs (very soft plastic, less wear) no steel molds were necessary. In aluminium or also brass it would be possible to stamp the coos in with a lettering sytem similar to old printing systems. You have all letters made in steel which can be set together in the way you want them and get „hammered“ into the molds. Therefore you would need softer materials then steal and it would explain many nearly similar COOs which just one letter out of line next to one where all letters are in line or another letter which is out of line.

The terms used when describing the production process can vary from author to author and can be quite confusing for many. For example the term: „Mold“. In this thread I will use the term „steel-mold“ when I am talking about the actual molds the figures were made from, even though the mold may well be made of another material. To use only the word mold would be confusing, because mold (or mould) also describes the form of a figure in the collecting world. In addition the term „mold variant“ can also describe different colored materials the parts of a figure can be made of (i.e. „molded legs Han Hoth“). I will use the term „mold color variant“ for better understanding when discussing these types of figures.






COOs: DECLARATION AND FORMS:

The term COO is short for „country of origin“. It is mostly used to specify the country mark but the term can also be used to talk about all the information on the figure. The coo has three main components:

  • The copyright
  • The year
  • The country

005231.jpg



A) The copyright

The copyright starts with the typical symbol for it the „c“ with circle around it: ©. On the vintage figures it is then followed by three different abbreviations: G.M.F.G.I (General Mills Fun Group, Inc.), C.P.G. (Consumer Products Group company) and L.F.L. (Lucas Film Limited)
The G.M.F.G.I was used for the first 20 figures, C.P.G. only for the Boba Fett, and L.F.L. for all other figures excpet the R2 sensorscope (ESB) because the mold of the early R2 (solid dome) was used.

012128.jpg
011142.jpg
010137.jpg




B) The year

The year is normally directly placed behind the copyright. In this case the year indicates when the copyright was acquired for the character. Its often said the figure was produced in this year what is simply wrong, because they didnt changed the molds every following year while producing. And also it explains why the R2 with pop-up saber is marked with 1977 although he was produced not before 1985. But for sure the year indicates also the time frame beginning with the production of a character (in his original form), because that simply goes together with acquiring the copyright.
Of course also in this case there is some exceptions, i.e. the brazil R2 with 1985 on it or the Barada that exists with 1984 as well as 1985. I also like to mention the R5-D4 which has 1977 marks and 1978 marks on it, because the mold from the R2 was used for the 1977 marked ones and the COO was not altered in this case.

C) The country

The country marks indicates where the figure was produced, which means where the plastic was injected into the „steel-molds“. This doesnt indicate where it was assembled, painted or packed, which can differ from the country mark.
From time to time the production location was changed, for several reasons like: lower costs, rising the production numbers, etc.
In these cases the molds were normally altered and the country marks where changed. In the later period of production this all got messed up and the „no COO figures“ (means no country marks) were born. I think Kenner realized that it is more simple to just stamp the locations on the cardback then change the molds every now and then.
The first production location was for sure Hong Kong. There is many controversial opinions what happens next. Taiwan coos can appear on ANH characters and ROTJ characters not on a single ESB character. There are two facts about Taiwan coos. The first is that these are not altered molds. They belong to the „original stamped“ ones and can already appear on SW 12-back cards (i.e. Luke). And the second is they were never changed into a no COO. Regarding this we probably can say: The Taiwan „steel-molds“ were produced for Taiwan and stayed in Taiwan, while the Hong Kong „steel-molds“ made there way to China and Macau where some of them were altered. The way they were altered can differ heavily and I’ll try to give an overview which can never be 100% because exceptions can happen.

1. Hong Kong:
Stamped „Made in Hong Kong“, „Hong Kong“ or „H.K.“. These are normally the unaltered „steelmolds“, so I call them „original coos“.
01691.jpg


2. Taiwan:
Stamped „Made in Taiwan“ or „Taiwan“. These are unaltered coos and also belong to the „original COOs“.
01782.jpg


3. Macau:
Stamped „Macau“, „Macao“ or the country is deleted (no COO). These are altered Hong Kong coos.
014108.jpg


4. China
Stamped „Made in China“ or „China“ always on a raised bar. Also the blank raised bars and other no coos can be China produced figures. These are all altered Hong Kong coos.
01874.jpg


5. No COO
Figures with no country stamped on can be produced as they are or can be altered molds where the country was deleted. The method used to delete them is no proof to the country where they were produced.

015106.jpg
009143.jpg

Produced no coo on Han Endor and altered coo on AT-AT Commander.



Production in South America
Figures were also produced, and by produced I mean the injection process, in Argentina (Top Toys), Brazil (Glasslite) and Mexico (Lili Ledy). In Argentina brand new molds where created for the Top Toys line, these have no COO marks at all (no copyright, no year, no country).
In Mexico and Brazil it‘s a little more complicated. Glasslite (the Licencee for Brazil) altered the COOs (changed the year) on the C-3PO and R2 molds but kept unaltered COOs for the rest of the line. Lili Ledy (The Licencee for Mexico) used many molds as they were. But they produced also some unique COOs. I have a non proven theorie and try to explain it here:
The unique coos seem not to be altered. The mold seems to be completely new with a unique „country stamp“(indeed these are all „no COO stamps“ with year and copyright or „no marks at all“ regarding the Logray).
The figures Im talking about are: Klaatu, Squid Head, Biker Scout, Gam Guard, Nien Nunb, Chief Chirpa, Logray, Lando Skiff, Ree Yees and Yoda. (Although some of these appeared in Spain with the same COO, but IMO these were bought in Mexico and just packed in Spain). Regarding these figures all have one thing in common: They all appeared also on MIM (Made in Mexico) cards in the USA. Given that these molds were not altered and the fact that new „steel-molds“ are very expensive it totally makes sense that exactly these figures were produced for more than just the mexican market. And even more it is assumed that Paploo and Lumat were only produced in Mexico for the worldwide market which also appeared on MIM cards. So you can see the situation in South America is very complicated, but this is nothing when compared to what happened in Europe.

European Production
During the last period of production for Europe, coos were deleted and replaced by rough scars. The figures themselves can have pretty obvious paint variants and coo variants can be found in Spain (PBP), France (Meccano) and England (Palitoy). Wild theories always try to explain the unexplainable. The huge amount of different paint variants on figures with exactly the same COO markings can be very confusing. In addition the materials the figures are made of can be exactly the same and in some cases vary quite a bit. So we have more then one question mark here

Its unknown and unlikely that all of the European countries produced (à plastic injection) their own figures. However it has been noted that PBP (Spain) had the ability to and were probably the only company in Europe actually manufacturing toys.
More proof that PBP manufactured figures can be found with by looking at the Spanish variants that exist in really low numbers and are only known to have appeared on PBP cards. They are also made from different materials then all other figures known with the same COO like the Stormtrooper (Ledy type no COO, creamy torso), Han Hoth (pale face and more violet torso) and Biker Scout (the „marshmallow“ looking limbs and head are unique). Also some of the accessories which appeared on Spanish cards are really unique like the red harness from 4-LOM.
The numbers of these are partially so low, that even on their „origin-card“ mostly other (non spanish) produced figures can be found. We are not 100% sure that PBP manufactured all their figures or for how long but it makes a lot of sense that they did produce some. Couple the strange variants that are found only on Spanish cards with the various stickers attached to carded figures with the text „Made in Spain“ written on them, it all adds up. Besides, it would make little sense for one of the Asian manufacturers to send these variants only to Spain in such low quantities.

The point is that its pretty sure that PBP (formally known as POCH) already painted some figures themselves in the ESB area (31 and 37/41A backs). What can be found on Poch cards is mostly „Hong Kong“ and „Made in Hong Kong“ marked figures (slightly or heavily different painted and packed). It seems they bought their figures unpainted and painted and assembled them on their own.
In addition some Ledy figures can pop up on spanish ROTJ cards like Yoda, Ben Kenobi, Luke Bespin etc. These are exactly like their originals in mexico. Many people tried to track down the differences but IMO is there is simply non, not even in the accessories. So if we just look at the Spanish market we can say:
- likely bought unassambled and unpainted figures to paint and pack them (early ESB)
- likely produced their own figures (mold process plus paint process in later ESB and ROTJ area)
- and finally bought finished figures from Mexico (ROTJ) and Taiwan (ESB, ROTJ) to pack them.


PBP also seem to have exported their finished figures to other companys like Meccano or Palitoy where they were packed on their domestic cards
You can see that even trying to work out and assume what happened with one company is very hard work, the European part of the Vintage Star Wars puzzle is almost it’s own puzzle and possibly one that we can’t solve without concrete information.
Two points I like to add to show how complicated this detective work is:

1.Case: PBP Biker Scout
The loose collectors always knew that this must be a spanish variant because he was mostly found there loose. But no carded example showed up over years. All carded PBP Bikers that survived seemed to be Taiwan marked Biker Scouts. Nobody had any explanations for this.
Finally last year the one and only example of a packed PBP Biker with correct figure showed up. It is the same card all over (PBP ROTJ 65-back) like the Taiwan figures appeared on.


2.Case: PBP Bossk
This is also a very rare variant. Just like the PBP Biker mentioned above, it can be found loose in Spain but not a single PBP carded one has been found. On the other hand this variant was found on british (Palitoy ESB 45back, single stem blister) and german (General Mills ESB 45back, single stem blister) cards whilst only one loose example was found in England (as far as I am aware). So the real origin of this figures stays an unsolved mystery. The carded examples seem to be found in completely different locations to the loose ones and completely mess with the theory.


To me it will always be a big riddle and we may never know everything about these figures. We can assume that the European companies carded a mixture unpainted figures that had to be painted on site before being packaged and prepainted figures all ready to be packed. Maybe they had some kind of „product-sharing“ system. Every country was in charge of producing certain characters and there had to be a confusing exchange of finished and unfinished products. In the last years of production all overstock was probably thrown together and so some figure variants found their way one so many different cardbacks and so it will be impossible to be sure where the figures were produced/painted, when they were made and who produced what.
Maybe one day its possible to bring a little more light into all of this, but till then speculations are the only thing we have. And of course lots of beautiful and rare figure variants which make collecting loose variants so interesting.
To read more about the european Trilogo carded variants I can only advise you to read here:
http://trilogo.info/

At the end of the day one point is very important: The country stamp is in most cases no proof of where or when a figure was sold. Lots of collectors still try to categorize the figure-markings to cards or baggies. Some of these „rules“ are: Ledy is always no COO, China figures appeared only in China baggies, Trilogo has always no COO figures on it, Scarred out figures are always PBP, Taiwan figures only appeared in Europe, etc, etc. These „rules“ are all wrong and in so many cases. There is China figures even on HK cards, no COO figures on ESB cards and many HK figures on Trilogo cards. You can have China, HK, and no COO figures on Ledy cards, etc. You can of course find more Taiwan figures in Europe and some Hong Kong COOs seem to only have appeared in the US, but this is all very unsure and can never be for 100%.
So what is the COO good for then? In fact its more a stamp that marks a certain mold. Molds can be duplicated or „travel“ from producer to producer. Exeptions can be found in nearly all cases. Overstock was shipped in other countries and packed there on other cards, etc. So this thread is a reference which shows the stamps in relation to their mold and paint variants. To determine where or when these figures appeared is in most cases nearly impossible.







GENERAL TERMS IN COO COLLECTING:

All we have left is lots of different forms of the country stamps and many altered stamps. In most cases the country was not changed but simply deleted. The earliest deleted country marks known to me can be found on german (i.e. Han Solo Big Head „pink hands“, General Mills ESB 45back, single stem Blister) and british (i.e. Bossk „fat lips“, Palitoy ESB 45back, single stem blister) ESB cards, but we can be sure in most cases no COO marks appeared not before the ROTJ area.
Especially these deleted country stamps were named over the years and although I think these names are sometimes not so well chosen but they became standard terms in vintage collection. In general the coo is described as it appears on the figures and not how it appears in the „steel-mold“ (the negative). Thats a problem in my own opinion, because the naming sometimes describes the way how it was altered and therfore you should describe like the mold would look, i.e. the so called „melted down“ coo is in reality a „filled up“ coo. The term „melted down“ indicates that the coo on the legs was melted down on every figure which is for sure not the case. Anyway I will give a little inside in the forms, terms and the way these where altered eventually:

1. smooth deleted COO
It describes that the country is not visible and the place where it should be looks smooth. The area around the former stamp is on the same „height level“. The letters in the mold were filled up and precisly smoothed.
008163.jpg



2. melted down COO
It normally describes that the country is kind of still visible but mostly looks like melted. The term is also used for smooth deleted coos what is a problem to decide which is which. To me the melted down ones always have a little „rampart“ and some letters can be still slightly visible. In this case the coo was scratched out in the mold and was smoothed
007177.jpg



3. scarred out COO
It normally means that the figure has a deep scare where the country name formally was. The Scars look like someone had removed the coo with kind of a soldering iron.
In fact the the coo was actually filled up with kind of lead-tin mixture in this area of the mold.
These fill-ups are normally roughly made and have air bubbles which appear as dots on the figures.
009143.jpg



4. blank raised bar COO
This is the easiest one to spot. The coo was just „drilled“ out. This can be used to leave it blank or place another coo on it.
006206.jpg



Ill have to add some points to the so called „scarred out coo“. This is the only one which is roughly done and with lots of additional material (tin-lead mixture?) on top of the former coo. Thats the reason why the look of these can change while producing them in high numbers. The fact is that these „fill-ups“ can change or become damaged, fully or partially because of wear on the molds. A famous example is the half scarred Snaggletooth.
013117.jpg



To me it‘s clear that half of the „scar“ broke off while producing full scarred figures. Lots of them where produced and this mistake wasnt fixed or was changed very late (Perhaps it was simply not noticed in a busy factory). Thats why there are quite a few of them existing. In case of the Lando Bespin scars it is difficult to be sure what happend exactly. There are lots of different scars known, on some scars even single letters can be seen (again?). The fact is the Lando is one of the more common scarred figures and also there was not only one mold to produce him. However, regarding other scarred out figures we can assume that there was 2-4 different scarred out molds (in most cases 2 different scars are known on Greedo, ATAT Commander, Biker Scout, etc.). But there is a real large number of Lando scars excisting. Well, the only way to explain this is that the „fill-ups“ often broke out and in this case often were repaired or the fill-ups were renewed. Its of course just a theory but I think it makes the most sense.
There is another curious scarred out COO which I like to mention. The only known scarred out COO where a country mark was stamped on top of the scar is the famous Macao Biker Scout. Not only is this unique in the world of COOs but even better, PBP altered it again and removed the „Macao“, you can say „scarred out the scar“.

COO-familys
So as you can see, COOs can be changed all the time. As I mentioned before the stamps to me mainly are reference marks for the mold-form the figures has. So I bring in a new term: the „COO -family“. (Like a family tree)
In short a coo-family describes all molds that are the same on one character, no matter if they are duplicated exactly or the coo is altered. Ill give an example what can happen to a coo:

No matter how these stamps may have changed. All produced figures are molded the same way. If there are some differences this is caused by the particular material used to produce the figure. Some plastics look sloppy and not very defined after cooling some are more defined are sharper looking but the steel-mold the figure came from is the same. So they all belong to the same mold-family.
LUKE_XWING_Kopie.jpg


Another aspect from the coo-family is: Same mold but slightly different coo. Regarding the LXW again there can be two slightly different HK coos found. These 2 molds always traveled together and also were altered together.
LUKE_XWING_Kopie2.jpg



On this character we have 2 „coo-familys“. Some characters have more, some less. Most families have 2 different coos which traveled together and where altered together. This is really quite a guess, but I assume most „steel-molds“ were produced as pairs.
If a second pair was needed, new „steel-molds“ were made. Of course the ones that were already in production couldn‘t be duplicated without stopping production. This is the reason in my opinion why every new „steel-mold“ made has a slight different mold. Some of these changes may be modifications, others like slightly different folds in the cloth-mold were simply not intentional.


COO errors
There are a lot of production errors on figures, some terms we use to describe them are: „short shots“, „poor shots“ and „cooling errors“. These just describe a factory error which happened during mass production. Sometimes there is not enough plastic injected into the mold, there can be remnants from the former shot still in the mold (especially in the depths of a COO) or the plastic can be pulled out to early and deform while cooling.
So how can we be sure that a COO is no factory error? Well there is a few points that may help:
-Common sense
In my opinion there is no reason to just delete a year and leave the copyright and country on the figure. It also makes no sense to delete a copyright on a licensed figure and leave the country on the figure. A real no COO figure has two forms: no country with copyright and year left or no marks at all! Everything else makes no sense and if such figures appear they are nearly all factory errors in my opinion. (I already mentioned the fact that the „fill-ups“ can break out partially and if such failures are not corrected unlogical COOs can exist in large numbers, see the half scarred Snaggletooth)
- Quantity
There are some mythical coos that have only appeared once. COO collectors all over the world tried to track these down with no luck in achieving one. After years these examples are still the only known and no second example has been found so we can be pretty sure that these are just production errors. On the other hand there are 2 or 3 COOs which seem to be legit (no factory error possible because of the form) and they are still one of a kind. I will add these in my guide although I normally wouldnt do because one example that I didnt even hold in my hands is for real no proof of legitimacy. I of course will mention this in the guide.

You will notice that some coos that appeared on the old guide on RS have been removed, this is because I am pretty sure that they are not legitimate coo variations.

Faked COOs
And if it wasnt already complicated enough by now a new problem hits the market.
Unfortunately when certain areas of collecting become popular, people soon realise that certain „rare“ coo variations can be sold for a lot of money to unsuspecting collectors. Scammers with a little excercise and more experience could perfect this method of altering COOs and fakes could become a problem in near future so please be careful.


....sooo.....longer then I tought! Now on with the guide! :D (these emoticons a really scary, arent they?)

But first of all: BIG THANKS to Joe_O. He helped me in more then one session to get the text into a proper english. Thanks mate…big kudos!! ;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
2,084
Reaction score
118
Location
Germany
berries.jpg


*Click on the thumbs to see and enlarge the coo charts*
*NOTE: only Greedo and Boba Fett are availible for now*

SW_title.jpg

SW_01-75x108.jpg
SW_02-75x108.jpg
SW_03-75x108.jpg
SW_04-75x108.jpg
SW_05-75x108.jpg
SW_06-75x108.jpg

SW_07-75x108.jpg
SW_08-75x108.jpg
SW_09-75x108.jpg
SW_10-75x108.jpg
SW_11-75x108.jpg
SW_12-75x108.jpg

SW_14-75x108.jpg
SW_15-75x108.jpg
SW_16-75x108.jpg
SW_17-75x108.jpg
SW_18-75x108.jpg

SW_19-75x108.jpg
SW_20-75x108.jpg
SW_22-75x108.jpg



Note: "rel." means "related to". So if a no coo is marked with i.e. "rel. #3" , it means the no coo is related to coo number3. You can also say number 3 was altered to that specific no coo.


BIG THANKS TO:
- _ROG_ for beeing the first person giving me and the community insight into COO collecting and being the reason I started years ago. His webshotsalbums are still famous and are still an important source to me:
http://community.webshots.com/user/_Rog_
- Mike_Skywalker for beeing a sidekick in COO-collecting over many many years, always helpfull, willing to share and with an enormeous knowledge he could help me out nearly every week.
- Joe_O for beeing a very patient proofreader.
- all big coo collectors like: Lee_M and Idefix13, . And also the guys that alway were interested in my absurd theories and helped to bring some light into real difficult stuff like: Ozio, Sergio, Kenneth_B and many more.
- AllanB for, well.... he knows for what!! ;)
And finally:
This guide and the knowledge provided here wouldnt be possible without the help from collectors all over the world over years. Thanks to all people who shared their wisdom in the internet everywhere in the world and who participated in the old thread/guide to bring this on!

THANK YOU!
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Location
The Netherlands
A fantastic, very well presented overview!!

Thanks Wolff!! :congratulatory:

I am looking forward to the COO details of the other figures.
 
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
660
Reaction score
1
Location
Drums, Pa. USA
Oh man, I have been waiting for something like this. Great job! And thank you for doing this.

Now we need a guide for all of the other variations as well :) Probably never possible.
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2008
Messages
1,409
Reaction score
0
Location
Belgium
:encouragement: Kudos to you Wolf and the hard work you allready put in this COO guide and gathering information.
This is great reference material and i like your COO charts, they can be really helpfull to find certain COO's.

I hope you got it "done" once (soon) and maybe even get a printed book version of it. This would be handy the take along.

Anyway great Work.

Cheers, Dennis.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
660
Reaction score
1
Location
Drums, Pa. USA
So let me get this straight then. We really have no way of telling what kind of card anything came on. For example and I am not saying this is what it is, but the #1 Fett could have came on a US Card, Ledy Card, PBP Card, etc. That mystery we will never know?
 
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
2,084
Reaction score
118
Location
Germany
Thanks for the Kudos Marco, Chris, Church, Dennis, Lee and Tim

So let me get this straight then. We really have no way of telling what kind of card anything came on. For example and I am not saying this is what it is, but the #1 Fett could have came on a US Card, Ledy Card, PBP Card, etc. That mystery we will never know?

No we are able to solve some mysterys. Ill try again:

We have the big Asian producers, like Hong Kong, Taiwan, China and Macau. These produced figures that were packed in other countries and on several cards and baggies.
And we have the small local producers who produced (injection process) and packed their figures in the same place like Poch/PBP, Lili Ledy, Glasslite and Top Toys.

So we can solve the mystery what figures and coos appeared on LL, PBP/POCh, Glasslite and TopToys cards. There was and still is huge research from the community in these areas.

The problem is:
- Overstock
Some rare PBP figures can be found even on some US cards. Trilogo figures can already appear on ROTJ cards, etc
- Export
PBP, LL seemed to have some figures exported. These are also very common and can be find in large numbers everywhere in europe (PBP) and US (LL).
- Import
Again PBP also seemed to have Taiwan marked figures and LL figures imported to get the character numbers filled up. Maybe they were not able to produce them all on their own (PBP also produced other toys in this period). Maybe it was cheaper to do so, etc.


So if you talk about HK and Taiwan and China figures you can give examples where they have appeared, but you can not determine evrey HK Fett to a certain US, Europe, etc. card.
What we can do is to determine what figures appeared on LL, PBP, Glasslite and TT cards. BUT, and this is important, most coos they used arent unique! So you always need several characteristics to detremine these: Coo. plus material, plus color sheme, plus spray masks, etc.
In case of the LL figures the color shemes were even changed over the years. You can find several LL figures in more then one typical color sheme.

So this guide shows which coos are i.e. Ledy produced, but if there is noted also another variant below this coo you have to be carefull and need to check for other characteristics too!

In case of the Fett: We have the 2 mentioned LL coos: #7 and #8. This one is an easy one, because you can easily spot the Trilogo variant with the same coo: It is made of much lighter material (compare #7a and #7b). It would be great it would always be so simple....but it isnt.

I hope I brought some more light into this, and didnt confused you more!

I will soon update the article above, because I got some interesting news from JC. So check up for updates! ;)

Thanks

BTW: I didnt mentioned Meccano at all, but we have to solve some myterys there too. On french Trilogo cards we have some specific variants in very, very small numbers (with unique coo). Are these really asian procuced?? Only sent to Meccano?? Or did even meccano started their own production in a very very late period??? Sound all very unusual...
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
2,084
Reaction score
118
Location
Germany
Update:

- New thumbs! Just click on the character to see the coo charts!
- Boba Fett and Greedo are now uploaded!

hope you enjoy!
 
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
3,180
Reaction score
19
Location
Essex, UK
Wolff this is extremely well written! I believe your paragraph on European production will clear up a great deal of misconceptions. Thanks for sharing your work with us! Oli
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 9, 2009
Messages
317
Reaction score
0
Wolff,

Even though i have no interest in variants,i can still appreciate the amount of work,time & effort that you've put into your COO guide & like Joe's Trilogo website,its another valuable & welcome resource to the community! :)

Congrats & kudos to you!
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
1,677
Reaction score
15
Location
Wheeling, WV
Wolff,

Wow.. ok.. well, I think I now have to go poop! You did very well at putting all this information together into one source. I'm not a coo collector by any means but I do appreciate when people take the time to put something like this together for the community at the expense of their own time and research. I've read discussions before about coo's and dates and such but I never thought it was really this extensive. Kudos to you for putting all this together!! :victorious:
 
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
5,020
Reaction score
3
You know my feelings about your work Wolff, I always knew you were on the boards and in the community to bring something worthwhile to collecting and I firmly believe your COO guide will always be the most positive and memorable thing you brought to the forums :)

I hope this is used by many, I know from working with Wolff a little (on about 1% of his entire guide!!) that this is time consuming and was/is an insane and daunting guide to even comprehend let alone actually bring it to life and make it a reality, good luck my friend!
 
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
2,084
Reaction score
118
Location
Germany
First of all: thank you guys for all your nice comments!

The not so good news is: this thread died before it actually was "born".
Im just shocked, but Im not able to edit my first 2 posts anymore! This a new rule to the new forum and Im pretty shocked when I only think of all the guide and reference threads that are now ruined IMO.

Here is the discussion about it:
http://forum.rebelscum.com/showthread.php?1072259-Please-Read-New-Edit-Rules

Oh harsh...Im puzzeled...what shall we do now??
 
Joined
Oct 16, 2008
Messages
340
Reaction score
0
Location
Coffs Harbour, Australia
Awesome Wolff. I'd like to echo what Joe said above.
As far as the non-editing issue of the new site, something needs to be done as a workaround. Threads like this need to be able to evolve.
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
1,751
Reaction score
0
Location
california
great work. obviously a lot of time and research went into this. i know there are a few more fetts i need to try to find.
 
Joined
Feb 25, 2010
Messages
441
Reaction score
0
Location
France
Good to see that you're back on track Wolff. I too hope that some consideration can be given to the editing of resource threads like yours (and plenty of other worthwhile threads here that act as evolving resource guides) :encouragement:
 
Joined
May 11, 2008
Messages
2,084
Reaction score
118
Location
Germany
mods? Any views on bending the rules on this one? It is for a good cause.

Actually they work on it:
http://forum.rebelscum.com/showthread.php?1072550-Post-Editing-Limitations-And-You

I hope for all stickys, reference threads and for the customizing section that the first post will be editable soon. Its hard work for them so lets be patient. If you wanna be heard or have suggestions/ideas just chimn in!

Good to see that you're back on track Wolff....

Thanks mate!! Also thanks to Oli,Darth Stanley, Timster and Master_M_M for the nice replys!

You know my feelings about your work Wolff, I always knew you were on the boards and in the community to bring something worthwhile to collecting and I firmly believe your COO guide will always be the most positive and memorable thing you brought to the forums :)

I hope this is used by many, I know from working with Wolff a little (on about 1% of his entire guide!!) that this is time consuming and was/is an insane and daunting guide to even comprehend let alone actually bring it to life and make it a reality, good luck my friend!

Oh thats nice Joe...thanks a lot for all mate!! You have a own refernce site running with lots of updates and found the time to help me out! Really very nice from you and really apreciated here!! Big kudos to you also! ;)

Well done Wolff, is a great Job
Sincerely
Javi

Hey javi, thanks for the reply...nice to hear from you!! :)

Wolff,

Wow.. ok.. well, I think I now have to go poop! You did very well at putting all this information together into one source....
Hahhahhaa....hope there was no "impact" in your pants and you reached your bathroom in time....LOL



@knothead: Im looking forward to this ;)

Thanks for all the kudos

Wolff
 

HWR

Joined
Oct 5, 2001
Messages
7,362
Reaction score
1
Location
Vejle, Denmrk
Tremendous job you are doing on this (and the old) coo guide, Wolff. Hopefully we can get an overview with all different coo, that being font, position on figure and wether it goes from boot to torso or vice verse.

And no, I'm still not going to collect all the coo variations. :)
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2009
Messages
2,325
Reaction score
1
Upon completion this will become my new all time favourite thread (I'll finally go through all my figures & catalogue them). Will there be pictures of the figures as well, not just the leg markings to show some of the visual & mold variations? Thanks for sharing all your hard work with the rest of us.
 
Top