Been rewatching the 2003 Clone Wars series and doing comparisons with the 2008 Clone wars series and since both versions are very different I ask you...
Was grievous best when he was virtually unstoppable threat yet a considerably overpowered threat, or when he was a more cowardly yet cunning underpowered threat.
Now Grievous has always been one of my favorite characters in Star Wars, (in a way he was my generation's equivalent to Boba Fett) and it all started with the first time I witnessed his appearance in the 2003 Clone Wars. The dude didn't mess around, he was like a cybernetic tornado clearing out everyone in his path yet there is that debate that he was a bit much, where as in the 2008 series he was more a plotter and whenever he fought he would always get bested only to run away and have his droids back him up. Though episodes like Lair of Grievous and Massacre show him as being bad*** and rekindling that flame he had in the micro series it never seemed consistent (Grievous has droids help break up the battle between him and Ventress).
What do you guys think which do you prefer?