While I have great respect for Mr. McBride, one of my disturbing issues is in the case of a specific DT saber Luke. The first one I acquired that was pre graded, had an AFA 80. I contacted AFA and asked if the figure could be swapped out for a better looking one since this figure was discolored and slightly bent in the case.
AFA said "No problem, just make sure it's the same COO."
Since then, I can't trust their grade. After that is when I started to track figures that were coming up as graded.
For authenticity, I strongly agree that Provenance is key, but we are talking not about a 5-30 piece run like a DT Vader or Ben pre-production sample.
People should be aware that for a more common figure, provenance isn't taken into consideration as long as COO is maintained, at least according to AFA themselves.
This has been my personal, albeit, subjective experience.
Has it not bothered people that AFA displays not the saber with it's two parts exposed, but with the base of the DT inner saber proturding where none, I repeat NONE of the inner saber portion that does get bent is even displayed ina "graded" case?
I suggest that the AFA 75 Luke I mentioned earlier has one of the worst sabers I've seen, the outer tube was even severely bent. I will try to track down pics, which should be easy as the seller was chastized by this board for offering a questionable DT Vader and luke with what turned out to be a fake inner vader saber.
With all that I present, I just recommend that provenance is a great thing, but AFA, didn't care if the owner with a COA was to replace the Luke (again not a DT Vader or Ben).
This is similiar with a Vinyl Cape Jawa. How many times has it been said on this board, the cape is most important, because you can always find a mint figure to put with it?
Scary, I know, but is it better to not know they allow such a thing?


1Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks





Reply With Quote












